Executive Summary- May 2006
Based on the
responses of die casting companies to this survey, both the industry
shipments and profitability declined over 2005. Pounds shipped
decreased 7% since 2004. Profits remain positive, but weak with a median
net profit of 2.97% for all respondents. Another measure of
profitability, Income Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and
Amortization (IBITDA) increased since last year. Efficiency as measured
by output per employee increased by approximately 18% compared to 2004.
The 8.4% IBITDA shows an upturn compared to the 2004 where there was no
change. As economic conditions improve, these negative figures are
predicted to slowly turn upward in 2005.
Details
Eighteen (18)
diecasting industry companies participated in this year's survey with
all results based on the most recently ended fiscal year of each
participant. Companies with multiple plants are identified with their
headquarters location if the plants did not report separately. The
total number of die casting facilities represented by this survey was
26.
Of the 18
participants, 3 companies had Net Sales under $11.5 million/company, 4
companies had Net Sales between $11.5 and $26.3 million/company and 11
had Net Sales over $26.3 million/company. Median, upper and lower
quartile results for 2005 and the median ratios for 2004 are listed on
Attachment A. The ratio medians for three
size categories of annual sales are shown in Attachment B. The companies are split into three groups by annual
sales volume: companies under $11.5 million, $11.5 to $26.3 million and
over $26.3 million.
A ten-year
comparison of medians is included as Attachment C.
Additionally, a history of each ratio’s median, upper quartile and lower
quartile can be viewed online. These
charts can be used as the benchmark for the actual values from each
participant.
Medians and
Quartiles
The median ratio is
defined as the middle ratio ranking values from highest to lowest. When
there are an even number of ratios then the median is the average of the
two middle ratios. The median is considered characteristic of the
sample, since half the companies are above it, and half are below it. It
is more accurate than averages for small groups such as the one being
evaluated in the Annual Financial Survey. The upper and lower quartile
ratios define the spread of results and contain 50% of all companies
reporting. Ratios falling above and below the quartile limits are the
best and the worst performance ratios, respectively.
Accuracy of Data
To collect this
data, a standard form and instructions were designed to ensure
consistency in reporting. While it is believed that the reporting is
accurate, it cannot be guaranteed. Also, minor discrepancies may have
resulted from variations in accounting practices.
Overall, it is
believed that the aggregate information contained herein gives a valid
picture of the die-casting industry's financial performance for the
current period.
SUMMARY COMMENTS ON
MEDIANS – Attachment A
Return on
Investment Components
The score card of
any business is measured and evaluated by studying the ratios affecting
the Return on Investment (ROI) and Return on Assets (ROA) and by
determining reasons for the deviations or changes in those components.
ROI Success(Ratio
10) = Profitability(Ratio 20) x Control(Ratio 30) x Risk(Ratio 40)
ROA(Ratio 11) =
Profitability(Ratio 20) x Control(Ratio 30)
As shown in Table
I, the ROI (Ratio 10) has decreased this year due, in part, to lower
Profit Margins; 2005 Pretax Profit (Ratio 20) decreased from the 2004
percentage. The Turnover of Assets (Ratio 30) increased slightly, and
the Contribution Margin (Ratio 24) increased from 2004.
Period Costs (Ratio
25) decreased as a percentage of sales. Income Before Interest, Taxes,
Depreciation and Amortization (IBITDA) (Ratio 21)---another measure of
profitability---shows an increase from the previous year. A ten-year
trend in these two values can be seen in the graph below. Profits have
remained flat over this period while IBITDA has fallen moderately.

Return on
Assets-Pretax (Ratio 11) is a better performance measurement of
operating results, since it eliminates the leverage factor from the ROI
formula. The 2005 median ratio of 5.10% shows a decrease in operations,
compared to 2004's median ratio of 6.68%.
|
Ratio No. |
Description |
2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
1997 |
|
10 |
Return on Equity- Pretax |
11.6 |
18.00% |
15.60% |
14.10% |
24.30% |
25.00% |
16.80% |
23.00% |
|
11 |
Return on Asset-Pretax |
5.1$ |
6.7% |
7.00% |
4.20% |
8.80% |
12.30% |
5.80% |
8.2$ |
|
20 |
Pretax Profit % of Sales |
3.0% |
3.5% |
4.40% |
2.50% |
3.90% |
5.00% |
3.00% |
4.00% |
|
30 |
Turnover of Assets |
1.87x |
1.85x |
1.79x |
1.92x |
1.70x |
2.07x |
1.90x |
2.11x |
|
40 |
Leverage Ratio |
2.12:1 |
2.03:1 |
1.43:1 |
1.89:1 |
2.25:1 |
1.99:1 |
2.17:1 |
2.23:1 |
|
50 |
Net Sales % Prior Year |
98.59% |
106.7% |
100.00% |
92.79% |
111.50% |
101.60% |
106.40% |
109.50% |
Control
and Risk Ratios
Median Asset
Turnover (Ratio 30) increased to 1.87X from 1.85X in 2004, while
collection of Receivables (Ratio 32) decreased to 51 days compared to 58
days in 2004. Accounts payable is at 39 days. The median Leverage Ratio
(Ratio 40) increased slightly to 2.12 in 2005 from 2.03 in 2004, while
long-term debt as a percent of equity increased significantly from 2004.
Profitability and
Growth Ratios
The median of the
Pretax Profitability Ratio (Ratio 20) decreased in 2005. Tooling Net
Sales as a % of Sales (Ratio 25D1) has shown an increase for the first
time in four years. Sales (Ratio 50) and Pounds Shipped (Ratio 50A)
decreased from the prior year with an 8% loss in sales volume, and a 7%
decrease in pounds shipped.
Miscellaneous
Ratios
The productivity
ratios of Sales per Total Employees (Ratio 60) and Sales per Hourly
Manufacturing Employees (Ratio 61) both showed increases from the 2004
medians indicating a gain in manufacturing efficiency. Total Payroll as
a % of Sales (Ratio 62) decreased slightly since 2004. Manufacturing
Payroll Percent of Sales (Ratio 62A) decreased to 24.81 in 2005 from
26.83 in 2004. The trend over the past eight years is positive as shown
in the graph below. Pension & Profit Sharing is calculated as a percent
of total payroll and increased compared to 2004.


Conversion Costs
In
comparing the Conversion Cost elements by the three size categories (see
Table II), Direct Conversion only slightly changes as companies get
larger, and large companies appear to have the lowest labor cost as a
percent of sales.
|
Table II – Median Ratios of Direct Conversion
Costs |
|
|
Under $ 11.5 Million |
$11.5 to $26.3 Million |
Over $26.3 Million |
|
Direct Labor |
18.55% |
14.40% |
8.44% |
|
Indirect Labor |
2.26% |
5.00% |
6.64% |
|
TOTAL LABOR |
20.81% |
19.40% |
15.08% |
|
Variable Manufacturing |
10.76% |
14.29% |
16.17% |
|
DIRECT CONVERSION* |
42.99% |
36.36% |
44.18% |
|
*Components do
not add to total. |
Metals
Cast
Reporting
companies cast a variety of alloy types with the majority casting
multiple alloys. The largest group casts both Aluminum and Zinc (80%)
alloys. The breakdown is as follows:
